Home Springwood Forum

Blue Mountains Gazette
Wednesday, 26 September 2007

'No worth' in Woolies plan

By Damien Madigan

Centre of controversy: Springwood Chamber of Commerce is concerned by council plans to consider selling the Springwood Civic Centre site.
Centre of controversy: Springwood Chamber of Commerce is concerned by council plans to consider selling the Springwood Civic Centre site.

Council is facing increasing pressure to reject any move by Woolworths to come to Springwood after the town’s Chamber of Commerce formally criticised this possibility last week.

In its submission to council’s plan for Springwood’s revitalisation, the chamber of commerce stated “the introduction of a national chain supermarket will not resolve the problems associated with the identified trade downturn for small retailers in the town centre”.

“In fact, lessons from other, similar ventures show the potential to impact very seriously on existing small retailers. Were the expressions of interest stage to lead to input from large, national retail chains, the Chamber of Commerce would insist on its right to very significant involvement in the subsequent BMCC decision-making process.”

Although the submission does not refer to Woolworths by the name, council has already admitted the supermarket giant has informally approached it about coming to Springwood.

Council will vote on an expression of interest process for the Springwood town centre next month where it is expected to invite the private sector to submit proposals for the town.

These will be focused on three sites: the civic centre/library precinct, the northern (Franklins) car park, and the southern (town square) car park.

While the chamber of commerce welcomed council’s concern for the economic vitality of the Springwood town centre, it urged council to retain its “village atmosphere”.

It also urged caution over council’s ambitious timetable for the project.

“The Springwood Chamber of Commerce points out that whatever schedules the BMCC has set for this process should not dictate results of the process in any way, and that the results of the process are far more important than maintaining any arbitrary timetable ever could be,” the submission states.

The chamber also poured cold water on plans to sell council-owned land to pay for facilities like a new civic centre.

Admitting it was aware of the current civic centre’s shortcoming, it nevertheless stated “the selling of council land, and subsequent loss of control of the future of that land, in order to fund rebuilding or refurbishment, could well not be in the interests of the existing retail businesses and may well be considered unethical in the light of the council’s responsibilities to its ratepayers and residents”.